Finding a needle in a haystack: Toward a psychologically informed method for aviation security screening.
Author(s) -
Thomas C. Ormerod,
Coral J. Dando
Publication year - 2014
Publication title -
journal of experimental psychology general
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.521
H-Index - 161
eISSN - 1939-2222
pISSN - 0096-3445
DOI - 10.1037/xge0000030
Subject(s) - haystack , deception , airport security , aviation , identification (biology) , applied psychology , psychology , computer security , test (biology) , computer science , social psychology , engineering , artificial intelligence , paleontology , botany , biology , aerospace engineering
Current aviation security systems identify behavioral indicators of deception to assess risks to flights, but they lack a strong psychological basis or empirical validation. We present a new method that tests the veracity of passenger accounts. In an in vivo double-blind randomized-control trial conducted in international airports, security agents detected 66% of deceptive passengers using the veracity test method compared with less than 5% using behavioral indicator recognition. As well as revealing advantages of veracity testing over behavioral indicator identification, the study provides the highest levels to date of deception detection in a realistic setting where the known base rate of deceptive individuals is low.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom