Human performance on random interval schedules.
Author(s) -
Phil Reed,
Demelza Smale,
Dimitra Anna Owens,
Gary Freegard
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
journal of experimental psychology animal learning and cognition
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.041
H-Index - 71
eISSN - 2329-8464
pISSN - 2329-8456
DOI - 10.1037/xan0000172
Subject(s) - schedule , reinforcement , interval (graph theory) , context (archaeology) , psychology , statistics , mathematics , computer science , social psychology , biology , paleontology , combinatorics , operating system
Four experiments explored the factors controlling human responding on random interval (RI) schedules of reinforcement. All experiments identified 2 types of responding: "bout-initiation" and "within-bout" responding. Responding on RI schedules was related to the interval value rates, being higher on an RI-30s than on an RI-60s or RI-120s schedule, which impacted bout-initiation responding to the greater degree (Experiments 1 and 3). Experiment 2 found similar overall response rates on random ratio (RR) and random interval with a linear feedback loop (RI+) schedules, with both higher than on an RI schedule. Bout-initiation rates were similar across all schedules, but within-bout responding differed. Experiments 3 and 4 examined the impact of a response cost and noted greater bout-initiation responding but not greater within-bout rates with low costs. Overall, these experiments suggest that bout-initiation responding may be subject to control by factors that increase the strength of conditioning to the context, whereas within-bout responding is less sensitive to these influences. (PsycINFO Database Record
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom