z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Complementing the Sculpting Metaphor: Reflections on How Relationship Partners Elicit the Best or the Worst in Each Other
Author(s) -
Eli J. Finkel
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
review of general psychology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.519
H-Index - 98
eISSN - 1939-1552
pISSN - 1089-2680
DOI - 10.1037/gpr0000163
Subject(s) - metaphor , conceptualization , ideal (ethics) , epistemology , generative grammar , structuring , psychology , complement (music) , cognitive science , aesthetics , sociology , social psychology , computer science , philosophy , linguistics , chemistry , political science , artificial intelligence , biochemistry , complementation , law , gene , phenotype
A major idea in relationship science is that partners in a close relationship can “sculpt” each other in a manner that helps them align more closely with their ideal, or true, self. This sculpting metaphor is compelling, elegant, and generative, but it also possesses previously unrecognized liabilities, especially in its conceptualization of the ideal self as a sculpture yearning for release from a block of stone that is imprisoning it. Given the powerful role that metaphors play in structuring thought, overreliance on the sculpting metaphor has blinded us to certain questions even as it has sensitized us to others. To develop a comprehensive understanding of the ways in which relationship partners bring out the best or the worst in each other, we must complement the sculpting metaphor with metaphors that direct our attention to questions that it obscures, such as (a) where the ideal self comes from and (b) whether, how much, and how the ideal self changes over time.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom