z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Pitch and time, tonality and meter: How do musical dimensions combine?
Author(s) -
Jon B. Prince,
William Forde Thompson,
Mark A. Schmuckler
Publication year - 2009
Publication title -
journal of experimental psychology human perception and performance
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.691
H-Index - 148
eISSN - 1939-1277
pISSN - 0096-1523
DOI - 10.1037/a0016456
Subject(s) - tonality , salience (neuroscience) , relative pitch , speech recognition , pitch contour , psychology , context (archaeology) , musical , pitch (music) , acoustics , cognitive psychology , computer science , perception , physics , art , neuroscience , visual arts , paleontology , biology
The authors examined how the structural attributes of tonality and meter influence musical pitch-time relations. Listeners heard a musical context followed by probe events that varied in pitch class and temporal position. Tonal and metric hierarchies contributed additively to the goodness-of-fit of probes, with pitch class exerting a stronger influence than temporal position (Experiment 1), even when listeners attempted to ignore pitch (Experiment 2). Speeded classification tasks confirmed this asymmetry. Temporal classification was biased by tonal stability (Experiment 3), but pitch classification was unaffected by temporal position (Experiment 4). Experiments 5 and 6 ruled out explanations based on the presence of pitch classes and temporal positions in the context, unequal stimulus quantity, and discriminability. The authors discuss how typical Western music biases attention toward pitch and distinguish between dimensional discriminability and salience.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom