z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Steps proposed to resolve potential research conflicts at deep‐sea hydrothermal vents
Author(s) -
Mullineaux Lauren,
Juniper S. Kim,
Desbruyeres Daniel,
Cannat Mathilde
Publication year - 1998
Publication title -
eos, transactions american geophysical union
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.316
H-Index - 86
eISSN - 2324-9250
pISSN - 0096-3941
DOI - 10.1029/98eo00391
Subject(s) - hydrothermal vent , hydrothermal circulation , process (computing) , deep sea , odds , work (physics) , oceanography , lead (geology) , earth science , ecology , business , environmental resource management , environmental science , geology , computer science , biology , engineering , paleontology , mechanical engineering , logistic regression , machine learning , operating system
Biological researchers studying deep‐sea hydrothermal vents occasionally find themselves at odds with their colleagues. The main issue is the incompatibility of two types of investigations—some are aimed at understanding how vent systems function by monitoring them in an undisturbed state and others study processes by manipulating the system or collecting parts of it, or both. The research community could resolve this conflict, we believe, by embracing the concept of deep‐sea hydrothermal vent reserves and by adopting a fair and equitable process for establishing reserves and disseminating information about them. At the same time those who need to manipulate the system or collect specimens could work at nearby sites and share data and samples.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom