z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Analysis of ERS‐1/2 synthetic aperture radar wave mode imagettes
Author(s) -
Kerbaol Vincent,
Chapron Bertrand,
Vachon Paris W.
Publication year - 1998
Publication title -
journal of geophysical research: oceans
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.67
H-Index - 298
eISSN - 2156-2202
pISSN - 0148-0227
DOI - 10.1029/97jc01579
Subject(s) - synthetic aperture radar , scatterometer , remote sensing , azimuth , standard deviation , geology , geodesy , wind speed , physics , meteorology , optics , mathematics , statistics
The European Space Agency (ESA) ERS‐1 and ERS‐2 C band VV polarization active microwave instrument (AMI) offers the unique ability to combine interlaced wind scatterometer and high‐resolution synthetic aperture radar (SAR) wave mode imagettes. In this study, more than 2000 imagettes were considered. Eadi imagette has been statistically analyzed in comparison with normalized radar cross‐section (NRCS) measurements from the scatterometer mode. During the ERS‐1 AMI wave mode mission the incidence angle of the imagette center was modified from roughly 19.9° to 23.5°. Using ERS‐1 and ERS‐2 NRCS, calibration has thus been completed for both configurations, which allows a better characterization of some signal data saturation effects. However, since a SAR relies on platform displacement to achieve fine resolution, surface motions reduce its nominal resolution. As the wind speed increases, scatterer motion occurring during the SAR integration time also increases, causing the characteristic large azimuth cutoff wavelength. Acknowledging the strong dependence between sea state conditions and azimuth smearing effects, our results are highlighted by the global comparison with wind estimates derived from the scatterometer. The results demonstrate the ability to define a SAR wind algorithm from a kinematic point of view. Finally, a higher‐order statistical analysis shows evidence of deviation from standard Rayleigh statistics, leading to a balance between K law and lognormal distributions. This deviation is mainly due to the SAR's high‐resolution properties.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here