z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Cloud feedback in atmospheric general circulation models: An update
Author(s) -
Cess R. D.,
Zhang M. H.,
Ingram W. J.,
Potter G. L.,
Alekseev V.,
Barker H. W.,
CohenSolal E.,
Colman R. A.,
Dazlich D. A.,
Del Genio A. D.,
Dix M. R.,
Dymnikov V.,
Esch M.,
Fowler L. D.,
Fraser J. R.,
Galin V.,
Gates W. L.,
Hack J. J.,
Kiehl J. T.,
Le Treut H.,
Lo K. K.W.,
McAvaney B. J.,
Meleshko V. P.,
Morcrette J.J.,
Randall D. A.,
Roeckner E.,
Royer J.F.,
Schlesinger M. E.,
Sporyshev P. V.,
Timbal B.,
Volodin E. M.,
Taylor K. E.,
Wang W.,
Wetherald R. T.
Publication year - 1996
Publication title -
journal of geophysical research: atmospheres
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.67
H-Index - 298
eISSN - 2156-2202
pISSN - 0148-0227
DOI - 10.1029/96jd00822
Subject(s) - general circulation model , variation (astronomy) , cloud feedback , atmospheric circulation , cloud computing , environmental science , climatology , atmospheric sciences , climate sensitivity , atmospheric models , circulation (fluid dynamics) , climate model , meteorology , climate change , computer science , geology , physics , atmosphere (unit) , mechanics , oceanography , operating system , astrophysics
Six years ago, we compared the climate sensitivity of 19 atmospheric general circulation models and found a roughly threefold variation among the models; most of this variation was attributed to differences in the models' depictions of cloud feedback. In an update of this comparison, current models showed considerably smaller differences in net cloud feedback, with most producing modest values. There are, however, substantial differences in the feedback components, indicating that the models still have physical disagreements.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom