z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Multiwavelength comparison of modeled and measured remote tropospheric aerosol backscatter over Pacific Ocean
Author(s) -
Cutten D. R.,
Pueschel R. F.,
Bowdle D. A.,
Srivastava V.,
Clarke A. D.,
Rothermel J.,
Spinhirne J. D.,
Menzies R. T.
Publication year - 1996
Publication title -
journal of geophysical research: atmospheres
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.67
H-Index - 298
eISSN - 2156-2202
pISSN - 0148-0227
DOI - 10.1029/95jd03423
Subject(s) - backscatter (email) , lidar , aerosol , wavelength , troposphere , remote sensing , forward scatter , environmental science , optics , mie scattering , spectrometer , scattering , meteorology , physics , light scattering , geology , telecommunications , computer science , wireless
Aerosol concentrations and size distributions in the middle and upper troposphere over the remote Pacific Ocean were measured with a forward scattering spectrometer probe (FSSP) on the NASA DC‐8 aircraft during NASA's Global Backscatter Experiment (GLOBE) in May–June 1990. The FSSP size channels were recalibrated based on refractive index estimates from flight‐level aerosol volatility measurements with a collocated laser optical particle counter (LOPC). The recalibrated FSSP size distributions were averaged over 100‐s intervals, fitted with lognormal distributions and used to calculate aerosol backscatter coefficients at selected wavelengths. The FSSP‐derived backscatter estimates were averaged over 300‐s intervals to reduce large random fluctuations. The smoothed FSSP aerosol backscatter coefficients were then compared with LOPC‐derived backscatter values and with backscatter measured at or near flight level from four lidar systems operating at 0.53, 1.06, 9.11, 9.25, and 10.59 μm. Agreement between FSSP‐derived and lidar‐measured backscatter was generally best at flight level in homogeneous aerosol fields and at high backscatter values. FSSP data often underestimated low backscatter values especially at the longer wavelengths due to poor counting statistics for larger particles (>0.8 μm diameter) that usually dominate aerosol backscatter at these wavelengths. FSSP data also underestimated backscatter at shorter wavelengths when particles smaller than the FSSP lower cutoff diameter (0.35 μm) made significant contributions to the total backscatter.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom