Validation of hydrogen fluoride measurements made by the Halogen Occultation Experiment from the UARS platform
Author(s) -
Russell James M.,
Deaver Lance E.,
Luo Mingzhao,
Cicerone Ralph J.,
Park Jae H.,
Gordley Larry L.,
Toon Geoffrey C.,
Gunson Michael R.,
Traub Wesley A.,
Johnson David G.,
Jucks Kenneth W.,
Zander Rudolph,
Nolt Ira G.
Publication year - 1996
Publication title -
journal of geophysical research: atmospheres
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.67
H-Index - 298
eISSN - 2156-2202
pISSN - 0148-0227
DOI - 10.1029/95jd01705
Subject(s) - stratosphere , occultation , sunrise , hydrogen fluoride , longitude , environmental science , sunset , atmospheric sciences , halogen , meteorology , atmospheric chemistry , ozone , latitude , physics , chemistry , astrophysics , optics , astronomy , inorganic chemistry , alkyl , organic chemistry
The hydrogen fluoride (HF) molecule is important as a tracer and for study of chlorine input to the stratosphere due to CFC's. This paper describes the characteristics of and data from the Halogen Occultation Experiment (HALOE) HF channel, including steps taken to validate the results. The on‐orbit precision of the HF measurements is shown to be better than 0.04 parts per billion by volume (ppbv) to 0.06 ppbv throughout the stratosphere. The estimated accuracy is 14% to 27% depending on altitude. The internal consistency of the HF measurements is excellent as judged by sunrise/sunset differences and comparison with HALOE CH 4 distributions. The mean difference between HALOE HF and correlative balloon underflight measurements is <7% from 5 mbar to 50 mbar. Comparisons with the shuttle ATLAS 1 Atmospheric Trace Molecules Observed by Spectroscopy (ATMOS) data are not as good and there is a systematic difference between HALOE (smaller) and ATMOS (larger) ranging from 10% to 20% at altitudes above the 10‐mbar pressure level. Differences with ATMOS reach as much as 40% or more below the 10‐mbar level. The larger differences in this region are believed to be due to dynamical influences on HF coupled with wide separations in space and time between HALOE and ATMOS measurements. Analysis of HALOE HF pressure versus longitude cross sections shows that obtaining close space and time coincidence can be very important in comparing tracer distributions. Typical characteristics of a pressure versus latitude cross section and polar orthographic projection are also discussed. Comparisons with latitudinal distributions of tracer measurements from previous experiments show similar features like the tropical double minimum due to the semiannual oscillation. All comparisons and analyses conducted provide good confidence in the validity of the HALOE HF results.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom