z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Estimating the Likelihood of GHG Concentration Scenarios From Probabilistic Integrated Assessment Model Simulations
Author(s) -
Huard David,
Fyke Jeremy,
CapellánPérez Iñigo,
Matthews H. Damon,
Partanen AnttiIlari
Publication year - 2022
Publication title -
earth's future
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.641
H-Index - 39
ISSN - 2328-4277
DOI - 10.1029/2022ef002715
Subject(s) - coupled model intercomparison project , probabilistic logic , environmental science , climate change , greenhouse gas , representative concentration pathways , climate model , bayesian probability , statistical model , econometrics , sampling (signal processing) , computer science , statistics , mathematics , ecology , filter (signal processing) , computer vision , biology
The climate scenarios that form the basis for current climate risk assessments have no assigned probabilities, and this impedes the analysis of future climate risks. This paper proposes an approach to estimate the probability of carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) concentration scenarios used in key climate change modeling experiments. It computes the CO 2 emissions compatible with the concentrations prescribed by Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 5 (CMIP5) and CMIP6 experiments. The distribution of these compatible cumulative emissions is interpreted as the likelihood of future emissions given a concentration pathway. Using Bayesian analysis, the probability of each pathway can be estimated from a probabilistic sample of future emissions. The approach is demonstrated with five probabilistic CO 2 emission simulation ensembles from four Integrated Assessment Models (IAM), leading to independent estimates of the likelihood of the CO 2 concentration of Representative Concentration Pathways (RCP) and Shared Socioeconomic Pathways (SSP). Results suggest that SSP5‐8.5 is unlikely for the second half of the 21st century, but offer no clear consensus on which of the remaining scenarios is most likely. Estimates of likelihoods of CO 2 concentrations associated with RCP and SSP scenarios are affected by sampling errors, differences in emission sources simulated by the IAMs, and a lack of a common experimental framework for IAM simulations. These shortcomings, along with a small IAM ensemble size, limit the applicability of the results presented here. Novel joint IAM and the Earth System Model experiments are needed to deliver actionable probabilistic climate risk assessments.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here