Open AccessLightning morphology and impulse charge moment change of high peak current negative strokes
Author(s) -
Lu Gaopeng,
Cummer Steven A.,
Blakeslee Richard J.,
Weiss Stephanie,
Beasley William H.
Publication year - 2012
Publication title -
journal of geophysical research: atmospheres
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.67
H-Index - 298
eISSN - 2156-2202
pISSN - 0148-0227
DOI - 10.1029/2011jd016890
Subject(s) - impulse (physics) , lightning (connector) , physics , peak current , atmospheric electricity , lightning detection , meteorology , moment (physics) , geology , electric field , geodesy , thunderstorm , power (physics) , electrode , classical mechanics , quantum mechanics , electrochemistry
We have analyzed very high frequency lightning mapping observations and remote magnetic field measurements to investigate connections between lightning morphology and impulse charge moment change (iCMC) of negative cloud‐to‐ground (CG) strokes with high estimated peak currents. Four lightning morphologies are identified for a total of 2126 strokes within optimum detection range of the North Alabama Lightning Mapping Array, and statistical iCMC distributions are given for each of these types. Almost all (>90%) of the largest impulse charge moments (greater than −200 C km in this data set) are not produced by strokes in ordinary negative CG flashes. Instead, negative strokes with the largest iCMCs are almost exclusively associated with two unusual flash types that both initially develop as positive (normal) intracloud lightning. In the first type the negative stroke with high iCMCs results from a negative leader that descends from the midlevel negative charge region after the upper level negative leader ceases propagating. In the second type, the upper level negative leader of the intracloud lightning progresses toward ground as a so‐called bolt from the blue to generate the negative stroke. Measurements of strokes associated with four negative polarity sprites suggest that all four were most likely produced in the first unusual lightning type. Our results highlight that estimated peak current and impulse charge transfer are not always well correlated and that the in‐cloud lightning structure strongly influences charge transfer on short time scales in negative CG strokes.