Open AccessApplication of the CALIOP layer product to evaluate the vertical distribution of aerosols estimated by global models: AeroCom phase I results
Author(s) -
Koffi Brigitte,
Schulz Michael,
Bréon FrancoisMarie,
Griesfeller Jan,
Winker David,
Balkanski Yves,
Bauer Susanne,
Berntsen Terje,
Chin Mian,
Collins William D.,
Dentener Frank,
Diehl Thomas,
Easter Richard,
Ghan Steven,
Ginoux Paul,
Gong Sunling,
Horowitz Larry W.,
Iversen Trond,
Kirkevåg Alf,
Koch Dorothy,
Krol Maarten,
Myhre Gunnar,
Stier Philip,
Takemura Toshihiko
Publication year - 2012
Publication title -
journal of geophysical research: atmospheres
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.67
H-Index - 298
eISSN - 2156-2202
pISSN - 0148-0227
DOI - 10.1029/2011jd016858
Subject(s) - aerosol , environmental science , lidar , atmospheric sciences , extinction (optical mineralogy) , altitude (triangle) , climatology , northern hemisphere , meteorology , geography , remote sensing , geology , mathematics , paleontology , geometry
The CALIOP (Cloud‐Aerosol Lidar with Orthogonal Polarization) layer product is used for a multimodel evaluation of the vertical distribution of aerosols. Annual and seasonal aerosol extinction profiles are analyzed over 13 sub‐continental regions representative of industrial, dust, and biomass burning pollution, from CALIOP 2007–2009 observations and from AeroCom (Aerosol Comparisons between Observations and Models) 2000 simulations. An extinction mean height diagnostic (Z α ) is defined to quantitatively assess the models' performance. It is calculated over the 0–6 km and 0–10 km altitude ranges by weighting the altitude of each 100 m altitude layer by its aerosol extinction coefficient. The mean extinction profiles derived from CALIOP layer products provide consistent regional and seasonal specificities and a low inter‐annual variability. While the outputs from most models are significantly correlated with the observed Z α climatologies, some do better than others, and 2 of the 12 models perform particularly well in all seasons. Over industrial and maritime regions, most models show higher Z α than observed by CALIOP, whereas over the African and Chinese dust source regions, Z α is underestimated during Northern Hemisphere Spring and Summer. The positive model bias in Z α is mainly due to an overestimate of the extinction above 6 km. Potential CALIOP and model limitations, and methodological factors that might contribute to the differences are discussed.