z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Depth‐based multivariate descriptive statistics with hydrological applications
Author(s) -
Chebana F.,
Ouarda T. B. M. J.
Publication year - 2011
Publication title -
journal of geophysical research: atmospheres
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.67
H-Index - 298
eISSN - 2156-2202
pISSN - 0148-0227
DOI - 10.1029/2010jd015338
Subject(s) - outlier , kurtosis , bivariate analysis , multivariate statistics , computer science , univariate , data mining , skewness , statistics , multivariate analysis , bivariate data , anomaly detection , focus (optics) , descriptive statistics , streamflow , artificial intelligence , mathematics , machine learning , cartography , geography , drainage basin , physics , optics
Hydrological events are often described through various characteristics which are generally correlated. To be realistic, these characteristics are required to be considered jointly. In multivariate hydrological frequency analysis, the focus has been made on modeling multivariate samples using copulas. However, prior to this step, data should be visualized and analyzed in a descriptive manner. This preliminary step is essential for all of the remaining analysis. It allows us to obtain information concerning the location, scale, skewness, and kurtosis of the sample as well as outlier detection. These features are useful to exclude some unusual data, to make different comparisons, and to guide the selection of the appropriate model. In the present paper we introduce methods measuring these features, which are mainly based on the notion of depth function. The application of these techniques is illustrated on two real‐world streamflow data sets from Canada. In the Ashuapmushuan case study, there are no outliers and the bivariate data are likely to be elliptically symmetric and heavy‐tailed. The Magpie case study contains a number of outliers, which are identified to be real observed data. These observations cannot be removed and should be accommodated by considering robust methods for further analysis. The presented depth‐based techniques can be adapted to a variety of hydrological variables.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here