z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
A reassessment of spectral T e estimation in continental interiors: The case of North America
Author(s) -
Kirby J. F.,
Swain C. J.
Publication year - 2009
Publication title -
journal of geophysical research: solid earth
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.67
H-Index - 298
eISSN - 2156-2202
pISSN - 0148-0227
DOI - 10.1029/2009jb006356
Subject(s) - geology , admittance , noise (video) , inversion (geology) , coherence (philosophical gambling strategy) , square (algebra) , geodesy , seismology , geometry , physics , mathematics , computer science , statistics , tectonics , electrical impedance , quantum mechanics , artificial intelligence , image (mathematics)
Conventional spectral T e studies use the real part of the admittance between gravity anomalies and topography or, alternatively, the square of the magnitude of the coherency (i.e., coherence). Here we show the utility of treating both the admittance and coherency as complex quantities. Inverting the real parts to estimate T e , we use the imaginary parts to tell if the inversion is biased by noise. One method inverts the square of the real coherency, with the internal‐to‐total load ratio F derived (as a function of wave number) directly from the gravity and topography. The other method inverts the real part of the admittance assuming that F is wave number‐independent. We test the methods using synthetic elastic plate models loaded at the surface and Moho in such a way that the final relief is the actual North American topography. In some of the models we add gravity noise generated by a model having both surface and internal loads such that the final topography is zero and find that both methods are susceptible to noise. Application of the two methods to North America gives T e maps showing substantial agreement except in regions affected by noise, but these are not a dominant part of the total area. Given the suggested mechanisms by which noise might arise, it is not surprising that it is not a more widespread feature of the North American craton. Importantly, both methods show that large parts of the Canadian Shield are characterized by T e > 100 km.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here