z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Energetic outer radiation belt electron precipitation during recurrent solar activity
Author(s) -
Clilverd Mark A.,
Rodger Craig J.,
MoffatGriffin Tracy,
Spanswick Emma,
Breen Paul,
Menk Frederick W.,
Grew Russell S.,
Hayashi Kanji,
Mann Ian R.
Publication year - 2010
Publication title -
journal of geophysical research: space physics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.67
H-Index - 298
eISSN - 2156-2202
pISSN - 0148-0227
DOI - 10.1029/2009ja015204
Subject(s) - van allen radiation belt , electron precipitation , geomagnetic storm , earth's magnetic field , atmospheric sciences , electron , precipitation , solar wind , physics , environmental science , storm , geophysics , meteorology , magnetic field , magnetosphere , plasma , nuclear physics , quantum mechanics
Transmissions from three U.S. VLF (very low frequency) transmitters were received at Churchill, Canada, during an event study in May to November, 2007. This period spans four cycles of recurrent geomagnetic activity spaced ∼27 days apart, with daily ΣKp reaching ∼30 at the peaks of the disturbances. The difference in the amplitude of the signals received during the day and during the night varied systematically with geomagnetic activity, and was used here as a proxy for ionization changes caused by energetic electron precipitation. For the most intense of the recurrent geomagnetic storms there was evidence of electron precipitation from 3 < L < 7 for 10–15 days after the peak of the disturbance, as measured by ΣKp and Dst. This was consistent with the time variation of the fluxes of Polar Operational Environmental Satellites (POES) >300 keV and ∼1 MeV trapped electrons, and also consistent with the daily average ULF (ultralow frequency) Pc1–2 power ( L = 3.9) from Lucky Lake, Canada, which was elevated during the ∼1 MeV electron precipitation period. This suggests that Pc1–2 waves may play a role in outer radiation belt loss processes during this interval. We show that the >300 keV trapped electron flux from POES is a reasonable proxy for electron precipitation during recurrent high‐speed solar wind streams, although it did not describe all of the variability that occurred. While energetic electron precipitation can be described through a proxy such as Kp or Dst, careful incorporation of time delays for different electron energies must be included. Dst was found to be the most accurate proxy for electron precipitation during the weak recurrent‐activity period studied.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom