Open AccessHygroscopic growth of atmospheric and model humic‐like substances
Author(s) -
Dinar E.,
Taraniuk I.,
Graber E. R.,
Anttila T.,
Mentel T. F.,
Rudich Y.
Publication year - 2007
Publication title -
journal of geophysical research: atmospheres
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.67
H-Index - 298
eISSN - 2156-2202
pISSN - 0148-0227
DOI - 10.1029/2006jd007442
Subject(s) - aerosol , cloud condensation nuclei , differential mobility analyzer , relative humidity , chemistry , water vapor , environmental chemistry , particle (ecology) , surface tension , humic acid , meteorology , thermodynamics , organic chemistry , fertilizer , physics , oceanography , geology
The hygroscopic growth (HG) of humic‐like substances (HULIS) extracted from smoke and pollution aerosol particles and of Suwannee River fulvic acid (SRFA, bulk and fractions of different molecular weight) was measured by humidity tandem differential mobility analyzer (H‐TDMA). By characterizing physical and chemical parameters such as molecular weight, elemental composition, and surface tension, we test the effect of these parameters on particle interactions with water vapor. For molecular weight‐fractionated SRFA fractions, the growth factor at 90% relative humidity was generally inversely proportional to the molecular weight. HULIS extracts from ambient particles are more hygroscopic than all the SRFA fractions and exhibit different hygroscopic properties depending on their origin and residence time in the atmosphere. The results point out some dissimilarities between SRFA and aerosol‐derived HULIS. The cloud condensation nuclei (CCN) behavior of the studied materials was predicted on the basis of hygroscopic growth using a recently introduced approach of Kreidenweis et al. (2005) and compared to CCN activity measurements on the same samples (Dinar et al., 2006). It is found that the computational approach (Kreidenweis et al., 2005) works reasonably well for SRFA fractions but is limited in use for the HULIS extracts from aerosol particles. The difficulties arise from uncertainties associated with HG measurements at high relative humidity, which leads to large errors in the predicted CCN activity.