z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
The largest aftershock ever recorded?
Author(s) -
Grasso J. R.,
Voisin C.
Publication year - 2005
Publication title -
eos, transactions american geophysical union
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.316
H-Index - 86
eISSN - 2324-9250
pISSN - 0096-3941
DOI - 10.1029/2005eo220005
Subject(s) - aftershock , seismology , geology , induced seismicity , magnitude (astronomy) , foreshock , shock (circulatory) , power law , fault (geology) , crust , geophysics , statistics , mathematics , physics , medicine , astronomy
The largest aftershock recorded so far of the Mw 9.3 Sumatra earthquake of 26 December 2004 might be assumed to be the 28 March off‐Sumatra event ( M w 8.7), which occurred three months later, 160 km away, and with a 0.6 magnitude deficit. Because the 28 March event reproduces in size and location the M w 8.5 main shock of 1861, it could be argued that it should rank as among Earth's top 10 largest main shocks since 1900. Whether the 28 March event was an aftershock or compound earthquake, what does it imply for the occurrence of the next Indonesian “Big One”? What is known about fault interactions and earthquake triggering primarily derives from shallow earthquakes in the brittle crust. This knowledge reduces to distribution laws in size and time: a power law for the frequency size distribution of earthquakes ‘ Gutenberg and Richter , 1954’; a power law for the decay of seismicity rate after any earthquake [ Omori , 1894; Utsu et al ., 1995]; and the Båth law for the average size of the largest aftershock [ Richter , 1958].

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom