z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
The temporal evolution of plate driving forces: Importance of “slab suction” versus “slab pull” during the Cenozoic
Author(s) -
Conrad Clinton P.,
LithgowBertelloni Carolina
Publication year - 2004
Publication title -
journal of geophysical research: solid earth
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.67
H-Index - 298
eISSN - 2156-2202
pISSN - 0148-0227
DOI - 10.1029/2004jb002991
Subject(s) - slab , geology , slab window , subduction , mantle (geology) , mantle wedge , geophysics , asthenosphere , mantle convection , seismology , tectonics , oceanic crust
Although mantle slabs ultimately drive plate motions, the mechanism by which they do so remains unclear. A detached slab descending through the mantle will excite mantle flow that exerts shear tractions on the base of the surface plates. This “slab suction” force drives subducting and overriding plates symmetrically toward subduction zones. Alternatively, cold, strong slabs may effectively transmit stresses to subducting surface plates, exerting a direct “slab pull” force on these plates, drawing them rapidly toward subduction zones. This motion induces mantle flow that pushes overriding plates away from subduction zones. We constrain the relative importance of slab suction and slab pull by comparing Cenozoic plate motions to model predictions that include viscous mantle flow and a proxy for slab strength. We find that slab pull from upper mantle slabs combined with slab suction from lower mantle slabs explains the observation that subducting plates currently move ∼4 times faster than nonsubducting plates. This implies that upper mantle slabs are strong enough to support their own weight. Slab suction and slab pull presently account for about 40 and 60% of the forces on plates, but slab suction only ∼30% if a low‐viscosity asthenosphere decouples plates from mantle flow. The importance slab pull has been increasing steadily through the Cenozoic because the mass and length of upper mantle slabs has been increasing. This causes subducting plates to double their speed relative to nonsubducting plates during this time period. Our model explains this temporal evolution of plate motions for the first time.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here