
Global Wildland Fire Emission Model (GWEM): Evaluating the use of global area burnt satellite data
Author(s) -
Hoelzemann Judith J.,
Schultz Martin G.,
Brasseur Guy P.,
Granier Claire,
Simon Muriel
Publication year - 2004
Publication title -
journal of geophysical research: atmospheres
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.67
H-Index - 298
eISSN - 2156-2202
pISSN - 0148-0227
DOI - 10.1029/2003jd003666
Subject(s) - environmental science , moderate resolution imaging spectroradiometer , satellite , deforestation (computer science) , chemical transport model , vegetation (pathology) , atmospheric sciences , climatology , spectroradiometer , greenhouse gas , land cover , meteorology , air quality index , land use , geography , geology , medicine , oceanography , physics , optics , civil engineering , pathology , computer science , engineering , programming language , aerospace engineering , reflectivity
The new Global Wildland Fire Emission Model (GWEM) has been developed on the basis of data from the European Space Agency's monthly Global Burnt Scar satellite product (GLOBSCAR) and results from the Lund‐Potsdam‐Jena Dynamic Global Vegetation Model (LPJ‐DGVM). GWEM computes monthly emissions of more than 40 chemical compounds and aerosols from forest and savanna fires. This study focuses on an evaluation of the GLOBSCAR data set. The GWEM version presented here makes use of the Moderate‐Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) land cover map. Emission totals for the year 2000 are 1741 Tg C, 5716 Tg CO 2 , 271 Tg CO, 12.52 Tg CH 4 , 9.09 Tg C (as nonmethane hydrocarbons), 8.08 Tg NO x (as NO), 24.30 Tg PM 2.5 , 15.80 Tg OC, and 1.84 Tg black carbon. These emissions are lower than other estimates found in literature. An evaluation assesses the uncertainties of the individual input data. The GLOBSCAR product yields reasonable estimates of burnt area for large wildland fires in most parts of the globe but experiences problems in some regions where small fires dominate. The seasonality derived from GLOBSCAR differs from other satellite products detecting active fires owing to the different algorithms applied. Application of the presented GWEM results in global chemistry transport modeling will require additional treatment of small deforestation fires in the tropical rain forest regions and small savanna fires, mainly in subequatorial Africa. Further improvements are expected from a more detailed description of the carbon pools and the inclusion of anthropogenic disturbances in the LPJ model.