Surface emissivity retrieval from Digital Airborne Imaging Spectrometer data
Author(s) -
Sobrino José A.,
JiménezMuñoz Juan C.,
LabedNachbrand Jélila,
Nerry Françoise
Publication year - 2002
Publication title -
journal of geophysical research: atmospheres
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.67
H-Index - 298
eISSN - 2156-2202
pISSN - 0148-0227
DOI - 10.1029/2002jd002197
Subject(s) - emissivity , remote sensing , normalized difference vegetation index , environmental science , normalization (sociology) , spectrometer , geology , optics , physics , oceanography , climate change , sociology , anthropology
A study has been carried out on the most recent algorithms for the estimation of land surface emissivity (ε) using high‐resolution data (Digital Airborne Imaging Spectrometer, DAIS) over the Rhine Valley (France) and Castilla La Mancha (Spain). Three published methods have been applied for extracting absolute spectral emissivity information from images recorded during the DAISEX experiment in 1999. They are NDVI Thresholds Method (NDVI THM ), Normalized Emissivity Method (NEM) and Temperature/Emissivity Separation (TES). These lather two methods were originally designed to work over geological surfaces. Five methods have been used for extracting relative spectral emissivity. They are temperature‐independent spectral indices method (TISI), reference channel method (REF), emissivity normalization method (NOR), emissivity re‐normalization method (RE), and alpha emissivity method (ALPHA), respectively. NDVI THM and NEM give the same absolute emissivity values with differences between 1% and 0.2% depending on the thermal channel considered, while NDVI THM and TES give the greatest differences, around 2%. The comparison with in situ values shows that NDVI THM gives the best results for vegetation plots, while NEM gives the best ones for bare soil and water plots. The TISI and NOR relative methods give the same relative emissivity values within less than 0.4%, in accordance with Becker and Li 's [1990] conclusion as regards the superiority of these methods compared to the others.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom