z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Response of the mesosphere to human‐induced perturbations and solar variability calculated by a 2‐D model
Author(s) -
Khosravi Rashid,
Brasseur Guy,
Smith Anne,
Rusch David,
Walters Stacy,
Chabrillat Simon,
Kockarts Gaston
Publication year - 2002
Publication title -
journal of geophysical research: atmospheres
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.67
H-Index - 298
eISSN - 2156-2202
pISSN - 0148-0227
DOI - 10.1029/2001jd001235
Subject(s) - mesopause , mesosphere , atmospheric sciences , flux (metallurgy) , environmental science , physics , chemistry , stratosphere , organic chemistry
We have used the improved NCAR interactive 2‐D model (SOCRATES) to investigate the chemical and thermal response of the mesosphere to composition changes from the preindustrial era (∼1850) to the present, to doubling the CO 2 concentration, and to the 11‐year solar flux variability. The calculations show that all regions in the model mesosphere have cooled relative to the preindustrial times. The mesopause region has cooled by ∼5 K and the winter pole by up to 9 K near 60 km. Ozone mixing ratio has decreased by about 5% in the lower mesosphere and by about 30% near the summer mesopause region (caused by a dramatic increase in [OH]). Doubling the CO 2 abundance cools the whole mesosphere by about 4–16 K and has a complicated effect on O 3 , which exhibits an alternating increase/decrease behavior from the lower mesosphere up to the mesopause region. Similar results are obtained, in both magnitude and structure, for the O 3 response to a decrease in solar UV flux. Similarities are also found in the response of T, OH, and H to these two perturbations. These results lead to the conclusion that the long‐term increase in the well‐mixed greenhouse gases, in particular CO 2 , alters the thermal structure and chemical composition of the mesosphere significantly and that these anthropogenic effects are of the same magnitude as the effects associated with the 11‐year solar cycle. Thus, the difference in the timescales involved suggests that the anthropogenic signal over periods of typically 10 years is smaller than the signal generated by the 11‐year solar variability. Finally, analysis of the results from a simulation of the combined perturbations (2 × CO 2 + 11‐year solar variability) shows that, for the most part, the solar variability does not interact with increasing CO 2 and vice versa; that is, the two effects are additive.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here