z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Performance of SM8 on a Test To Predict Small-Molecule Solvation Free Energies
Author(s) -
Adam Chamberlin,
Christopher J. Cramer,
Donald G. Truhlar
Publication year - 2008
Publication title -
the journal of physical chemistry b
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.864
H-Index - 392
eISSN - 1520-6106
pISSN - 1520-5207
DOI - 10.1021/jp8028038
Subject(s) - solvation , gas phase , basis set , implicit solvation , molecule , mean squared error , root mean square , chemistry , aqueous solution , thermodynamics , phase (matter) , density functional theory , computational chemistry , materials science , physics , mathematics , quantum mechanics , statistics , organic chemistry
The SM8 quantum mechanical aqueous continuum solvation model is applied to a 17-molecule test set proposed by Nicholls et al. (J. Med. Chem. 2008, 51, 769) to predict free energies of solvation. With the M06-2X density functional, the 6-31G(d) basis set, and CM4M charge model, the root-mean-square error (RMSE) of SM8 is 1.08 kcal mol(-1) for aqueous geometries and 1.14 kcal mol(-1) for gas-phase geometries. These errors compare favorably with optimal explicit and continuum models reported by Nicholls et al., having RMSEs of 1.33 and 1.87 kcal mol(-1), respectively. Other models examined by these workers had RMSEs of 1.5-2.6 kcal mol(-1). We also explore the use of other density functionals and charge models with SM8 and the RMSE increases to 1.21 kcal mol(-1) for mPW1/CM4 with gas-phase geometries, to 1.50 kcal mol(-1) for M06-2X/CM4 with gas-phase geometries, and to 1.27-1.64 kcal mol(-1) with three different models at B3LYP gas-phase geometries.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom