English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

The role of the oxide support on the structure of the MoS2 active phase (size, morphology, orientation, sulfidation ratio, etc.) remains an open question in hydrotreating catalysis and biomass processing with important industrial implications for the design of improved catalytic formulations. The present work builds on an aqueous-phase surface-science approach using four well-defined α-alumina single crystal surfaces (C (0001), A (112̅0), M (101̅0), and R (11̅02) planes) as surrogates for γ-alumina (the industrial support) in order to discriminate the specific role of individual support facets. The reactivity of the various surface orientations toward molybdenum adsorption is controlled by the speciation of surface hydroxyls that determines the surface charge at the oxide/water interface. The C (0001) plane is inert, and the R (11̅02) plane has a limited Mo adsorption capacity while the A (112̅0) and M (101̅0) surfaces are highly reactive. Sulfidation of model catalysts reveals the highest sulfidation degree for the A (112̅0) and M (101̅0) planes suggesting weak metal/support interactions. Conversely, a low sulfidation rate and shorter MoS2 slabs are found for the R (11̅02) plane implying stronger Mo-O-Al bonds. These limiting cases are reminiscent of type I/type II MoS2 nanostructures. Structural analogies between α- and γ- alumina surfaces allow us to bridge the material gap with real Al2O3-supported catalysts. Hence, it can be proposed that Mo distribution and sulfidation rate are heterogeneous and surface-dependent on industrial γ-Al2O3-supported high-surface-area catalysts. These results demonstrate that a proper control of the γ-alumina morphology is a strategic lever for a molecular-scale design of hydrotreating catalysts.

Aqueous-Phase Preparation of Model HDS Catalysts on Planar Alumina Substrates: Support Effect on Mo Adsorption and Sulfidation