z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Neutral RuII-Based Emitting Materials: A Prototypical Study on Factors Governing Radiationless Transition in Phosphorescent Metal Complexes
Author(s) -
Elise Y. Li,
YiMing Cheng,
ChengChih Hsu,
PiTai Chou,
GeneHsiang Lee,
I-Hui Lin,
Yün Chi,
ChaoShiuan Liu
Publication year - 2006
Publication title -
inorganic chemistry
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.348
H-Index - 233
eISSN - 1520-510X
pISSN - 0020-1669
DOI - 10.1021/ic060066g
Subject(s) - phosphorescence , chemistry , ligand (biochemistry) , transition metal , quinoxaline , metal , molecule , quinoline , luminescence , atom (system on chip) , photochemistry , crystallography , fluorescence , organic chemistry , catalysis , biochemistry , physics , receptor , optoelectronics , quantum mechanics , computer science , embedded system
In addition to the metal-centered dd transition that is widely accepted as a dominant radiationless decay channel, other factors may also play important roles in governing the loss of phosphorescence efficiency for heavy-transition-metal complexes. To conduct our investigation, we synthesized two dicarbonylruthenium complexes with formulas [Ru(CO)2(BQ)2] (1) and [Ru(CO)2(DBQ)2] (2), for which the cyclometalated ligands BQ and DBQ denote benzo[h]quinoline and dibenzo[f,h]quinoxaline, respectively. Replacing one CO ligand with a P donor ligand such as PPh2Me and PPhMe2 caused one cyclometalated ligand to undergo a 180 degrees rotation around the central metal atom, giving highly luminous metal complexes [Ru(CO)L(BQ)2] and [Ru(CO)L(DBQ)2], where L = PPh2Me and PPhMe2 (3-6), with emission peaks lambda(max) in the range of 571-656 nm measured in the fluid state at room temperature. It is notable that the S0-T1 energy gap for both 1 and 2 is much higher than that of 3-6, but the corresponding phosphorescent spectral intensity is much weaker. Using these cyclometalated Ru metal complexes as a prototype, our experimental results and theoretical analysis draw attention to the fact that, for complexes 1 and 2, the weaker spin-orbit coupling present within these molecules reduces the T1-S0 interaction, from which the thermally activated radiationless deactivation may take place. This, in combination with the much smaller 3MLCT contribution than that observed in 3-6, rationalizes the lack of room-temperature emission for complexes 1 and 2.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom