English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

We consider the impact of gross, systematic, and random experimental errors in relation to their impact on the predictive ability of QSAR/QSPR DMPK models used within early drug discovery. Models whose training sets contain fewer but repeatedly measured data points, with a defined threshold for the random error, resulted in prediction improvements ranging from 3.3% to 23.0% for an external test set, compared to models built from training sets in which the molecules were defined by single measurements. Similarly, models built on data with low experimental uncertainty, compared to those built on data with higher experimental uncertainty, gave prediction improvements ranging from 3.3% to 27.5%.

How Experimental Errors Influence Drug Metabolism and Pharmacokinetic QSAR/QSPR Models