z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Comparison of CH4 and CO2 Adsorptions onto Calcite(10.4), Aragonite(011)Ca, and Vaterite(010)CO3 Surfaces: An MD and DFT Investigation
Author(s) -
Ming Zhang,
Jian Li,
Junyu Zhao,
Youming Cui,
Xian Luo
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
acs omega
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.779
H-Index - 40
ISSN - 2470-1343
DOI - 10.1021/acsomega.0c00345
Subject(s) - calcite , aragonite , vaterite , adsorption , physisorption , chemisorption , chemistry , population , calcium carbonate , crystallography , inorganic chemistry , chemical physics , mineralogy , organic chemistry , demography , sociology
The interaction between greenhouse gases (such as CH 4 and CO 2 ) and carbonate rocks has a significant impact on carbon transfer among different geochemical reservoirs. Moreover, CH 4 and CO 2 gases usually associate with oil and natural gas reserves, and their adsorption onto sedimentary rocks may influence the exploitation of fossil fuels. By employing the molecular dynamics (MD) and density functional theory (DFT) methods, the adsorptions of CH 4 and CO 2 onto three different CaCO 3 polymorphs (i.e., calcite(10.4), aragonite(011)Ca, and vaterite(010)CO 3 ) are compared in the present work. The calculated adsorption energies ( E ad ) are always negative for the three substrates, which indicates that their adsorptions are exothermic processes and spontaneous in thermodynamics. The E ad of CO 2 is much more negative, which suggests that the CO 2 adsorption will form stronger interfacial binding compared with the CH 4 adsorption. The adsorption precedence of CH 4 on the three surfaces is aragonite(011)Ca > vaterite(010)CO 3 > calcite(10.4), while for CO 2 , the sequence is vaterite(010)CO 3 > aragonite(011)Ca > calcite(10.4). Combining with the interfacial atomic configuration analysis, the Mulliken atomic charge distribution and overlap bond population are discussed. The results demonstrate that the adsorption of CH 4 is physisorption and that its interfacial interaction mainly comes from the electrostatic effects between H in CH 4 and O in CO 3 2- , while the CO 2 adsorption is chemisorption and the interfacial binding effect is mainly contributed by the bonds between O in CO 2 and Ca 2+ and the electrostatic interaction between C in CO 2 and O in CO 3 2- .

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom