English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

The calculation of X-ray emission spectra has been addressed with the algebraic diagrammatic construction (ADC) scheme, using a core-ionized wave function as the reference state. With this, the valence-to-core transitions are found as the first eigenstates with negative eigenvalues. The performance of the ADC hierarchical methods ADC(2), ADC(2)-x, and ADC(3/2) has been investigated on 17 transition of second-row elements (C, N, O, F, and Ne), and 5 transitions of third-row elements (S and Cl). We report ADC(2) results within 0.20 ± 0.36 eV of experimental values with an appropriate choice of basis set and when accounting for relativistic effects, with a slight tendency toward underestimating emission energies. By comparison, ADC(2)-x yields a similar spread in relative energies, but a consistent overestimation of approximately 1.5 eV. Going to ADC(3/2), we now observe an underestimation of emission energies and a larger error spread. By comparison, calculations of X-ray absorption spectra have been reported to favor the ADC(2)-x method, with ADC(2) showing the largest error when comparing to experimental values. The difference in ADC performance trends between these core spectroscopies are attributed to the different electron rearrangement effects in X-ray absorption and emission processes.

Simulating X-ray Emission Spectroscopy with Algebraic Diagrammatic Construction Schemes for the Polarization Propagator