A Benchmark of Electrostatic Method Performance in Relative Binding Free Energy Calculations
Author(s) -
Ge Yunhui,
David F. Hahn,
David L. Mobley
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
journal of chemical information and modeling
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.24
H-Index - 160
eISSN - 1549-960X
pISSN - 1549-9596
DOI - 10.1021/acs.jcim.0c01424
Subject(s) - benchmark (surveying) , electrostatics , work (physics) , range (aeronautics) , non equilibrium thermodynamics , energy (signal processing) , molecular dynamics , statistical physics , computer science , materials science , computational physics , molecular physics , atomic physics , chemistry , computational chemistry , physics , thermodynamics , quantum mechanics , geodesy , composite material , geography
Relative free energy calculations are fast becoming a critical part of early stage pharmaceutical design, making it important to know how to obtain the best performance with these calculations in applications that could span hundreds of calculations and molecules. In this work, we compared two different treatments of long-range electrostatics, Particle Mesh Ewald (PME) and Reaction Field (RF), in relative binding free energy calculations using a nonequilibrium switching protocol. We found simulations using RF achieve comparable results to those using PME but gain more efficiency when using CPU and similar performance using GPU. The results from this work encourage more use of RF in molecular simulations.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom