Linking Housing Policy, Housing Typology, and Residential Energy Demand in the United States
Author(s) -
Peter Berrill,
Kenneth Gillingham,
Edgar G. Hertwich
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
environmental science and technology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 1520-5851
pISSN - 0013-936X
DOI - 10.1021/acs.est.0c05696
Subject(s) - greenhouse gas , stock (firearms) , counterfactual thinking , natural resource economics , business , public housing , typology , energy demand , agricultural economics , economics , economic growth , geography , ecology , philosophy , archaeology , epistemology , biology
Residential energy demand can be greatly influenced by the types of housing structures that households live in, but few studies have assessed changes in the composition of housing stocks as a strategy for reducing residential energy demand or greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. In this paper we examine the effects of three sequenced federal policies on the share of new housing construction by type in the U.S., and estimate the cumulative influence of those policies on the composition of the 2015 housing stock. In a counterfactual 2015 housing stock without the policy effects, 14 million housing units exist as multifamily rather than single-family, equal to 14.1% of urban housing. Accompanied by floor area reductions of 0-50%, the switch from single- to multifamily housing reduces energy demand by 27-47% per household, and total urban residential energy by 4.6-8.3%. This paper is the first to link federal policies to housing outcomes by type and estimate associated effects on residential energy and GHG emissions. Removing policy barriers and disincentives to multifamily housing can unlock a large potential for reducing residential energy demand and GHG emissions in the coming decades.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom