English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

NMR spectroscopy and mass spectrometry are the two major analytical platforms for metabolomics, and both generate substantial data with hundreds to thousands of observed peaks for a single sample. Many of these are unknown, and peak assignment is generally complex and time-consuming. Statistical correlations between data types have proven useful in expediting this process, for example, in prioritizing candidate assignments. However, this approach has not been formally assessed for the comparison of direct-infusion mass spectrometry (DIMS) and NMR data. Here, we present a systematic analysis of a sample set (tissue extracts), and the utility of a simple correlation threshold to aid metabolite identification. The correlations were surprisingly successful in linking structurally related signals, with 15 of 26 NMR-detectable metabolites having their highest correlation to a cognate MS ion. However, we found that the distribution of the correlations was highly dependent on the nature of the MS ion, such as the adduct type. This approach should help to alleviate this important bottleneck where both 1D NMR and DIMS data sets have been collected.

Statistical Correlations between NMR Spectroscopy and Direct Infusion FT-ICR Mass Spectrometry Aid Annotation of Unknowns in Metabolomics