Open AccessAltered gene expression in the transition phase by disruption of a Na + /H + antiporter gene ( shaA ) in Bacillus subtilis
Author(s) -
Kosono Saori,
Asai Kei,
Sadaie Yoshito,
Kudo Toshiaki
Publication year - 2004
Publication title -
fems microbiology letters
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.899
H-Index - 151
eISSN - 1574-6968
pISSN - 0378-1097
DOI - 10.1016/s0378-1097(04)00037-0
Subject(s) - antiporter , mutant , bacillus subtilis , transcription (linguistics) , sigma factor , gene expression , transcription factor , biology , microbiology and biotechnology , gene , chemistry , promoter , biochemistry , genetics , bacteria , linguistics , philosophy , membrane
The shaA gene (sodium‐hydrogen antiporter gene A, identical to mrpA ) is largely responsible for Na + extrusion in Bacillus subtilis . The disruption of shaA combined with a low concentration of NaCl completely abolishes sporulation but allows normal growth. To investigate the role of shaA and shaA ‐mediated sodium ion homeostasis in sporulation, we performed a comprehensive study of expression profiles of eight alternative sigma factors, σ B and the seven extracytoplasmic function sigma factors (σ M , σ V , σ W , σ X , σ Y , σ Z , and σ YlaC ) in an attempt to determine the global change of gene expression that results from a disturbance of Na + homeostasis caused by shaA disruption. Induction of σ B activity in the transition phase was impaired in the shaA mutant, and this effect was enhanced in the presence of 30 mM NaCl. Salt stress activation of σ B occurred normally in the shaA mutant. σ M ‐, σ W ‐, σ X ‐dependent transcription and sigZ transcription was also induced in the transition phase of the wild‐type, which was modulated by shaA disruption. The induction of σ M ‐dependent transcription was enhanced in the shaA mutant, while that of σ X ‐dependent transcription and sigZ transcription was decreased. σ W ‐dependent transcription was increased throughout the growth phase of the shaA mutant, which was consistent with the result of proteome analysis. We conclude that shaA disruption resulted in the modulated induction of alternative sigma factor activities, which would be problematic for the cell upon entering the sporulation stage.