z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Blunt carotid injury with thrombotic occlusion: Is an intervention always required for best outcome?
Author(s) -
Amulya Rattan,
Ruby Kataria,
Ajay Kumar,
Quamar Azam
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
trauma case reports
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.183
H-Index - 6
ISSN - 2352-6440
DOI - 10.1016/j.tcr.2019.100263
Subject(s) - medicine , blunt , pseudoaneurysm , stroke (engine) , surgery , thrombosis , dissection (medical) , conservative management , blunt trauma , stenosis , intervention (counseling) , occlusion , radiology , aneurysm , mechanical engineering , psychiatry , engineering
Blunt cerebrovascular injuries are rare, comprises of 0.08 to 0.33% of all traumatic blunt injuries. Depending on the grade of severity, they may heal with minimal consequences or may lead to debilitating and devastating stroke. Surgically accessible lesions are infrequent and hence endovascular management is preferred modality for high-grade lesions. We hereby present a case of complete thrombosis of the common carotid artery, which couldnu0027t receive either surgical or endovascular treatment due to low resource settings. The patient developed a stroke after 18 h of trauma, which, however, recovered completely and dramatically within 96 h. To the best of our knowledge, such rapid and complete recovery from stroke secondary to blunt carotid injury managed non-operatively hasnu0027t been reported in literature so far. Our report adds to the scarce but growing body of evidence recommending conservative management in BCVI in absence of enlarging pseudoaneurysm and dissection with near-complete stenosis.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom