Production, convention and power: Constructing the sound of an Early Music orchestra
Author(s) -
F. Pierre
Publication year - 2005
Publication title -
sociologie du travail
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.211
H-Index - 26
eISSN - 1777-5701
pISSN - 0038-0296
DOI - 10.1016/j.soctra.2005.08.002
Subject(s) - violin , musical , sound (geography) , face (sociological concept) , interpretation (philosophy) , power (physics) , convention , set (abstract data type) , visual arts , acoustics , aesthetics , psychology , communication , computer science , art , sociology , linguistics , philosophy , art history , social science , physics , quantum mechanics , programming language
By explaining how an Early Music orchestra produces its sound, we can review Howard Becker’sconcept of a convention. An orchestra’s sound depends on principles incorporated in things (musicalinstruments, scores) and bodies (musicians’ techniques).A common set of principles about interpretinga piece of music—principles acquired well before any rehearsal—do not suffice for coordinatinga group of musicians. As observations have shown, face-to-face interactions are decisive in thiscoordination. The conductor is not omniscient and does not impose his interpretation on musicians.Relations based on authority, being unstable, are redistributed among the conductor, soloist and firstviolin during rehearsals. Recognizing the importance of face-to-face interactions draws attention tothe cogency of power relations, which, though omnipresent, are constantly reworked in the situationfor producing an orchestra’s sound
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom