Contribution of Group Work and Comparative Education to Students’ Learning: Analysis of Comparative Design History Course
Author(s) -
Dilek Hocaoğlu
Publication year - 2015
Publication title -
procedia - social and behavioral sciences
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
ISSN - 1877-0428
DOI - 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.841
Subject(s) - mathematics education , matching (statistics) , work (physics) , course (navigation) , group work , computer science , group (periodic table) , design education , engineering , psychology , visual arts , mathematics , mechanical engineering , statistics , aerospace engineering , art , chemistry , organic chemistry
After the discovery of steam power and machinery, the industry has evolved faster and the designers began to design products for mass production by the influence of concepts. During the “design history” courses, matching periods, designers, and products could be more confusing for students. Those courses are generally taught theoretically and are not implemented as interactively.This study based on “Comparative Design History” course, in which design students work in groups on various topics and match the relevant cases between “design history” and those topics. In this paper, group work, comparative education and its contribution to students learning, will be studied
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom