Understanding of Basic Science Concepts: Does Taking More Science Courses Matter?
Author(s) -
Sibel Kaya
Publication year - 2014
Publication title -
procedia - social and behavioral sciences
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
ISSN - 1877-0428
DOI - 10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.184
Subject(s) - astrology , science education , test (biology) , mathematics education , nature of science , psychology , science, technology, society and environment education , paleontology , philosophy , theology , biology
This study aimed to examine and compare pre-service elementary and science teachers’ understanding of basic science concepts. A total of 353 fourth-year elementary and science education majors (272 female and 81 male), from a large public university in northwestern Turkey, participated in the study. A Scientific Knowledge Test, which was compiled from the National Science Foundation's Survey of Public Attitudes Toward and Understanding of Science and Technology, was used as the data collection instrument. Results showed that science education majors scored significantly higher on the Scientific Knowledge Test. Participants from the two programs had similar views on astrology and human evolution. Approximately 89 percent of them rated astrology as ‘scientific’ and only 24 percent endorsed human evolution. Semi-structured interviews were conducted to examine their views on these two topics. Interview findings showed that pre-service elementary and science teachers have similar misconceptions about astrology, evolution, and nature of science. It was concluded that although taking more science courses provides better understanding of basic science concepts, there are still critical misconceptions to overcome and teacher education programs need to adress these issues
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom