The short version of ruminative response scale: reliability, validity and its relation to psychological symptoms | Zendy

Özgür ErdurBaker | Zendy; Aslı Bugay | Zendy

AI Assistant Blog Pricing

Home ZAIA Blog

Open Access

The short version of ruminative response scale: reliability, validity and its relation to psychological symptoms

Author(s) -

Özgür ErdurBaker,

Aslı Bugay

Publication year - 2010

Publication title -

procedia - social and behavioral sciences

Language(s) - English

Resource type - Journals

ISSN - 1877-0428

DOI - 10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.07.433

Subject(s) - psychology , cronbach's alpha , confirmatory factor analysis , convergent validity , scale (ratio) , equivalence (formal languages) , reliability (semiconductor) , test validity , validity , clinical psychology , internal consistency , psychometrics , criterion validity , structural equation modeling , statistics , mathematics , power (physics) , physics , quantum mechanics , discrete mathematics

This study was designed to examine structural validity and reliability of short version of The Ruminative Response Scale (RRS) developed by Treynor, Gonzalez, and Nolen-Hoeksema (2003). Participants were 549 (307 girls, 242 boys) volunteering high school students. Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA), Internal Consistency Coefficient (Cronbach Alpha), and Convergent validity were used to assess cross-cultural equivalence of this particular instrument. Based on these results, The Ruminative Response Scale appears to be valid and reliable scale for Turkish samples

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.

Having issues? You can contact us here

Accelerating Research