TRIZ based interface conflict resolving strategies for modular product architectures | Zendy

Wessel W. Wits | Zendy; Thomas H.J. Vaneker | Zendy

AI Assistant Blog Pricing

Home ZAIA Blog

Open Access

TRIZ based interface conflict resolving strategies for modular product architectures

Author(s) -

Wessel W. Wits,

Thomas H.J. Vaneker

Publication year - 2011

Publication title -

procedia engineering

Language(s) - English

Resource type - Journals

SCImago Journal Rank - 0.32

H-Index - 74

ISSN - 1877-7058

DOI - 10.1016/j.proeng.2011.03.098

Subject(s) - triz , interface (matter) , modular design , product (mathematics) , systems engineering , architecture , focus (optics) , computer science , modular programming , abstraction , new product development , product design , function (biology) , engineering , human–computer interaction , manufacturing engineering , mathematics , business , art , philosophy , maximum bubble pressure method , optics , visual arts , biology , geometry , bubble , epistemology , marketing , evolutionary biology , parallel computing , programming language , physics , operating system

In product development, the chosen product architecture often possesses characteristics of both modular and integral design. Within a modular architecture, a Function-Behavior-Structure (FBS) model has been applied to describe modules and their interfaces. To resolve emerging interface conflicts, several strategies based on both modular and integral action have been formulated. The strategies encompass TRIZ methods, as they focus strongly on product innovation. The purpose of the presented study is to combine TRIZ techniques and FBS modeling while trying to solve interface conflicts at a low level of abstraction. The interface conflict resolving strategies have been applied on an industrial case study successfully

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.

Having issues? You can contact us here

Accelerating Research