z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
A Method to Choose Between Automation and Human Operators for Recovery Actions During a Cyber Attack
Author(s) -
Douglas L. Van Bossuyt,
Bryan M. O’Halloran
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
procedia computer science
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.334
H-Index - 76
ISSN - 1877-0509
DOI - 10.1016/j.procs.2019.05.089
Subject(s) - computer science , nuclear power , schedule , automation , computer security , operator (biology) , cyber physical system , nuclear power plant , action (physics) , the internet , reliability engineering , risk analysis (engineering) , operating system , mechanical engineering , engineering , medicine , ecology , biochemistry , chemistry , physics , repressor , quantum mechanics , transcription factor , gene , nuclear physics , biology
As complex systems such as nuclear power plants, naval ships, critical infrastructure, and other systems become more connected to the internet and digital control interfaces, the chance of a cyber attack causing physical damage to a system and failure of the system increases. In many systems, recovery actions can prevent an incipient failure from causing a system-wide failure. This paper presents a method of determining if a human operator or an automated system is more appropriate to complete a recovery action during a cyber attack. The method is useful during the conceptual phase of system design where architecture changes have minimal impact on the cost and schedule of the system design effort. Practitioners can use the method to make cost and probability-informed decisions. A case study of a spent fuel cooling pool in a nuclear power plant is presented to illustrate the method.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom