z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
BICA and Sex Differences: We Need to Understand Potential Sex Differences when Developing Computational Models of Human Behavior
Author(s) -
Christopher L. Dancy,
Frank E. Ritter
Publication year - 2015
Publication title -
procedia computer science
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.334
H-Index - 76
ISSN - 1877-0509
DOI - 10.1016/j.procs.2015.12.176
Subject(s) - computer science , focus (optics) , computational model , cognition , artificial intelligence , machine learning , cognitive psychology , psychology , neuroscience , optics , physics
Validating computational models of human behavior typically involves statistically comparing human data collected during an experiment to predictions made by the model. However, these models very rarely attempt to represent sex, despite the growing indication that there are sex-based differences in neural and behavioral responses to some external stimuli. We make a case for a stronger presence of male and female models of behavior in biologically inspired cognitive architectures, an area of research that is especially susceptible to physiological differences that can cause bottom-up behavioral differences. We conclude with discussion of previous data collected that highlight the importance of providing more focus on sex-based differences

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom