z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
The Politics of Resilience in the Dutch ‘Room for the River’-project
Author(s) -
Hans de Bruijn,
Mark de Bruijne,
Ernst ten Heuvelhof
Publication year - 2015
Publication title -
procedia computer science
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.334
H-Index - 76
ISSN - 1877-0509
DOI - 10.1016/j.procs.2015.03.070
Subject(s) - flood myth , resilience (materials science) , politics , incentive , corporate governance , exploit , computer science , environmental resource management , environmental planning , computer security , political science , business , environmental science , law , economics , finance , physics , philosophy , theology , thermodynamics , microeconomics
An increased focus on the concept of resilience in flood protection has led to the development of a comprehensive flood protection strategy in the Netherlands which stresses the need to provide ‘Room for the River’ rather than building dykes. But how can a resilient solution in flood protection be successfully implemented? Using insights from the major Dutch flood-protection project ‘Room for the River’, this article studies the governance of resilience. From a political perspective, resilience is often a win-lose game with many uncertainties. The actors involved have strong incentives to exploit these uncertainties and to hamper resilience based policies. The ‘Room for the River’-project was based upon the idea of resilience and had a win-lose character. Nevertheless, the many actors involved, with their conflicting interests, managed to reach consensus by broadening the agenda and by making flood protection a multi-issue game

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom