The Politics of Resilience in the Dutch ‘Room for the River’-project
Author(s) -
Hans de Bruijn,
Mark de Bruijne,
Ernst ten Heuvelhof
Publication year - 2015
Publication title -
procedia computer science
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.334
H-Index - 76
ISSN - 1877-0509
DOI - 10.1016/j.procs.2015.03.070
Subject(s) - flood myth , resilience (materials science) , politics , incentive , corporate governance , exploit , computer science , environmental resource management , environmental planning , computer security , political science , business , environmental science , law , economics , finance , physics , philosophy , theology , thermodynamics , microeconomics
An increased focus on the concept of resilience in flood protection has led to the development of a comprehensive flood protection strategy in the Netherlands which stresses the need to provide ‘Room for the River’ rather than building dykes. But how can a resilient solution in flood protection be successfully implemented? Using insights from the major Dutch flood-protection project ‘Room for the River’, this article studies the governance of resilience. From a political perspective, resilience is often a win-lose game with many uncertainties. The actors involved have strong incentives to exploit these uncertainties and to hamper resilience based policies. The ‘Room for the River’-project was based upon the idea of resilience and had a win-lose character. Nevertheless, the many actors involved, with their conflicting interests, managed to reach consensus by broadening the agenda and by making flood protection a multi-issue game
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom