A Method to Share Word Knowledge of Dependability Case | Zendy

Masanori MATSUMURA | Zendy; Vaise Patu | Zendy; Yutaka Matsuno | Zendy; Syota Takama | Zendy; Tatsuya Tokuno | Zendy; Shuichiro Yamamoto | Zendy

AI Assistant Blog Pricing

Home ZAIA Blog

Open Access

A Method to Share Word Knowledge of Dependability Case

Author(s) -

Masanori MATSUMURA,

Vaise Patu,

Yutaka Matsuno,

Syota Takama,

Tatsuya Tokuno,

Shuichiro Yamamoto

Publication year - 2013

Publication title -

procedia computer science

Language(s) - English

Resource type - Journals

SCImago Journal Rank - 0.334

H-Index - 76

ISSN - 1877-0509

DOI - 10.1016/j.procs.2013.09.076

Subject(s) - dependability , word (group theory) , computer science , diagram , natural language processing , data mining , theoretical computer science , artificial intelligence , reliability engineering , software engineering , linguistics , engineering , philosophy , database

ystem developers should explain system errors sufficiently, during a system failure situation. This is an essential act in order to verify the dependability of systems. Dependability Case (D-Case) is one method for confirming systems of dependability suffciently, against a system failure situations. However, in D-Case, we could not clearly describe the relationship of words (people, objects, activities) within its (D-Case) nodes. For this reason, we introduce a new way to define Word Relationship Diagram (WRD) that describes the relationship of words within D-Case and propose our conversion rules from Dependability Case to Word Relationship Diagram (D2W rule) and vice versa (from Word Relationship Diagram to Dependability Case (D2W rule)). In addition to this, (1) we created a rule for the relationship of words for D-Case. (2) We applied the rules to the Dependability Case (D-Case) and the Word Relationship Diagram (WRD) of a train operation system

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.

Having issues? You can contact us here

Accelerating Research