Is there any evidence for the validity of diagnostic criteria used for accommodative and nonstrabismic binocular dysfunctions? | Zendy

Pilar Cacho-Martínez | Zendy; Ángel García-Muñoz | Zendy; María Teresa RuizCantero | Zendy

Open Access

Is there any evidence for the validity of diagnostic criteria used for accommodative and nonstrabismic binocular dysfunctions?

Author(s) -

Pilar Cacho-Martínez,

Ángel García-Muñoz,

María Teresa RuizCantero

Publication year - 2013

Publication title -

journal of optometry

Language(s) - English

Resource type - Journals

SCImago Journal Rank - 0.844

H-Index - 25

eISSN - 1888-4296

pISSN - 1989-1342

DOI - 10.1016/j.optom.2013.01.004

Subject(s) - medicine , accommodation , psycinfo , optometry , cinahl , convergence insufficiency , medline , diagnostic accuracy , binocular vision , psychology , ophthalmology , psychiatry , artificial intelligence , radiology , neuroscience , political science , psychological intervention , computer science , law

To analyze the diagnostic criteria used in the scientific literature published in the past 25 years for accommodative and nonstrabismic binocular dysfunctions and to explore if the epidemiological analysis of diagnostic validity has been used to propose which clinical criteria should be used for diagnostic purposes.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.

Having issues? You can contact us here

Accelerating Research