Réplica al artículo «Registros hospitalarios de ictus: similitudes y diferencias»
Author(s) -
Ernest Palomeras
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
neurología
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.595
H-Index - 36
eISSN - 1578-1968
pISSN - 0213-4853
DOI - 10.1016/j.nrl.2016.04.002
Subject(s) - geography
It was with great interest that we read the letter in response to our recently published article1 underscoring the importance and benefits of stroke registries, and we wish to thank the authors for their valuable remarks. We agree that very few stroke registries have been published in our setting; this is especially significant in view of the high prevalence and great social impact of stroke. Prospective registries (not only for stroke, but for any condition) are a good working methodology and represent high-quality patient care. Furthermore, registries are essential to understand the natural history and trends of any condition; this is particularly relevant in the case of stroke, given the numerous diagnostic and treatment advances seen in stroke management. In addition to data from simple registries, it would be extremely helpful to have cumulative data and trend analyses such as those published by the team working at Hospital Universitari Sagrat Cor.2,3 Like-
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom