English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

PurposeImpetus on total arterial revascularization has led to increased use of the radial artery as a conduit for coronary artery bypass grafting. The radial artery conduit is being increasingly as alternative to saphenous vein as conduit. Recent interest has focused on endoscopic harvest using a single small incision in the wrist. However, data comparing this with the earlier open surgical technique is limited.MethodsWe have performed aggregate level meta-analysis pooling 1340 patients from six studies. The Peto odds ratio (OR) was obtained using fixed effect modeling. Continuous data was pooled as weighted mean difference (WMD).ResultsConduit length was comparable between methods [WMD 0.6(0.2–1.7)mm; p=0.3]. Endoscopic radial artery harvest led to lower rates of wound hematoma formation [OR 0.2 (0.08–0.47); p≤0.01] and wound infection [OR 0.4(0.1–0.9); p=0.04]. However, the incidence of forearm wound exploration was comparable [OR 0.6(0.2–1.7); p=0.34].ConclusionsEndoscopic radial artery harvest may reduce forearm complications after radial artery harvest. It may be the procedure of choice for harvesting the radial artery when needed

75. Endoscopic radial artery harvest reduces forearm complications when compared to conventional methods: A pooled Analysis