z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Good and bad uncertainty: Macroeconomic and financial market implications
Author(s) -
Gill Segal,
Ivan Shaliastovich,
Amir Yaron
Publication year - 2015
Publication title -
journal of financial economics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 11.673
H-Index - 256
eISSN - 1879-2774
pISSN - 0304-405X
DOI - 10.1016/j.jfineco.2015.05.004
Subject(s) - economics , volatility (finance) , risk premium , equity premium puzzle , capital asset pricing model , cash flow , monetary economics , asset (computer security) , valuation (finance) , equity (law) , financial economics , econometrics , finance , computer security , computer science , law , political science
Does macroeconomic uncertainty increase or decrease aggregate growth and asset prices? To address this question, we decompose aggregate uncertainty into ‘good’ and ‘bad’ volatility components, associated with positive and negative innovations to macroeconomic growth. We document that in line with our theoretical framework, these two uncertainties have opposite impact on aggregate growth and asset prices. Good uncertainty predicts an increase in future economic activity, such as consumption, output, and investment, and is positively related to valuation ratios, while bad uncertainty forecasts a decline in economic growth and depresses asset prices. Further, the market price of risk and equity beta of good uncertainty are positive, while negative for bad uncertainty. Hence, both uncertainty risks contribute positively to risk premia, and help explain the cross-section of expected returns beyond cash flow risk.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom