z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Postoperative outcomes and functional results after Deloyer's procedure – a retrospective cohort study
Author(s) -
Noel SalgadoNesme,
Omar VergaraFernández,
David Mitre-Reyes,
Hugo Alberto Luna-Torres,
Juan Francisco Molina-López,
Adolfo NavarroNavarro,
Jorge Guevara-Chipolini
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
journal of coloproctology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.167
H-Index - 11
eISSN - 2317-6423
pISSN - 2237-9363
DOI - 10.1016/j.jcol.2017.02.002
Subject(s) - medicine , surgery , ileostomy , statistical significance , anastomosis , retrospective cohort study
The objective of our study was to describe surgical outcomes of Deloyers procedure in our referral center, and to compare the results of patients with and without protective ileostomy. Methods Patients undergoing a Deloyers procedure from 2013 to 2016 were prospectively included. General characteristics, intraoperative variables, postoperative course, and functional outcomes were analyzed. Patients were compared into two groups: group (1) patients undergoing Deloyers procedure without ileostomy, and group (2) Deloyers procedure with protective ileostomy. Results Sixteen patients undergoing isoperistaltic transposition of the right colon remnant were included, of which 9 (63%) were males with a median age of 47 (range 22–76) years. The main surgical indication was the restoration of bowel transit (62.5%). There was higher major morbidity rate in the Deloyers procedure with protective ileostomy group, but without statistical significance (20% vs. 9%, p = 0.92). No leaks or deaths were reported. The length of hospital stay was 7 days. The mean number of bowel movements per day was 4 at 18 months of follow up. Only four (25%) patients used irregularly loperamide. Conclusions The Deloyers procedure has satisfactory results and is reproducible with low morbidity. The major and minor morbidity rates were similar between groups, suggesting that the costs and risks of a second procedure can be avoided by providing a safe primary anastomosis.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom