Levels of automation and user participation in usability testing
Author(s) -
Kent L. Norman,
Emanuele Panizzi
Publication year - 2005
Publication title -
interacting with computers
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.328
H-Index - 82
eISSN - 1873-7951
pISSN - 0953-5438
DOI - 10.1016/j.intcom.2005.06.002
Subject(s) - usability , computer science , human–computer interaction , usability lab , usability inspection , think aloud protocol , cognitive walkthrough , heuristic evaluation , automation , pluralistic walkthrough , usability engineering , test (biology) , process (computing) , focus (optics) , usability goals , software engineering , programming language , engineering , mechanical engineering , paleontology , physics , optics , biology
This paper identifies a number of factors involved in current practices of usability testing and presents profiles for three prototype methods: think-aloud, subjective ratings, and history files. We then identify ideal levels to generate the profile for new methods. These methods involve either a human observer or a self-administration of the test by the user. We propose methods of automating the evaluation form by dynamically adding items and modifying the form and the tasks in the process of the usability test. For self-administration of testing, we propose similar ideas of dynamically automating the forms and the tasks. Furthermore, we propose methods of eliciting the user's goals and focus of attention. Finally, we propose that user testing methods and interfaces should be subjected to usability testing. (c) 2005 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom