z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
The Tractability of Model-checking for LTL: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly Fragments
Author(s) -
Michael Bauland,
Martin Mundhenk,
Thomas Schneider,
Henning Schnoor,
Ilka Schnoor,
Heribert Vollmer
Publication year - 2009
Publication title -
electronic notes in theoretical computer science
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.242
H-Index - 60
ISSN - 1571-0661
DOI - 10.1016/j.entcs.2009.02.041
Subject(s) - model checking , linear temporal logic , mathematics , set (abstract data type) , temporal logic , propositional variable , discrete mathematics , computer science , theoretical computer science , algorithm , intermediate logic , programming language , description logic
In a seminal paper from 1985, Sistla and Clarke showed that the model-checking problem for Linear Temporal Logic (LTL) is either NP-complete or PSPACE-complete, depending on the set of temporal operators used. If, in contrast, the set of propositional operators is restricted, the complexity may decrease. This paper systematically studies the model-checking problem for LTL formulae over restricted sets of propositional and temporal operators. For almost all combinations of temporal and propositional operators, we determine whether the model-checking problem is tractable (in P) or intractable (NP-hard). We then focus on the tractable cases, showing that they all are NL-complete or even logspace solvable. This leads to a surprising gap in complexity between tractable and intractable cases. It is worth noting that our analysis covers an infinite set of problems, since there are infinitely many sets of propositional operators

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom