z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Submillisievert chest CT in patients with COVID-19 - experiences of a German Level-I center
Author(s) -
Christina Maria Hamper,
Florian Nima Fleckenstein,
Laura Büttner,
Bernd Hamm,
Nadine Thieme,
Hans-Martin Thieß,
Oriane Scholz,
Felix Döllinger,
Georg Böning
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
european journal of radiology open
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.49
H-Index - 15
ISSN - 2352-0477
DOI - 10.1016/j.ejro.2020.100283
Subject(s) - medicine , covid-19 , nuclear medicine , image quality , radiology , confidence interval , effective dose (radiation) , computed tomography , radiation dose , disease , infectious disease (medical specialty) , artificial intelligence , computer science , image (mathematics)
PurposeComputed tomography (CT) is used for initial diagnosis and therapy monitoring of patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). As patients of all ages are affected, radiation dose is a concern. While follow-up CT examinations lead to high cumulative radiation doses, the ALARA principle states that the applied dose should be as low as possible while maintaining adequate image quality. The aim of this study was to evaluate parameter settings for two commonly used CT scanners to ensure sufficient image quality/diagnostic confidence at a submillisievert dose.Materials and methodsWe retrospectively analyzed 36 proven COVID-19 cases examined on two different scanners. Image quality was evaluated objectively as signal-to-noise ratio (SNR)/contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) measurement and subjectively by two experienced, independent readers using 3-point Likert scales. CT dose index volume (CTDIvol) and dose-length product (DLP) were extracted from dose reports, and effective dose was calculated.ResultsWith the tested parameter settings we achieved effective doses below 1 mSv (median 0.5 mSv, IQR: 0.2 mSv, range: 0.3-0.9 mSv) in all 36 patients. Thirty-four patients had typical COVID-19 findings. Both readers were confident regarding the typical COVID-19 CT-characteristics in all cases (3 ± 0). Objective image quality parameters were: SNRnormal lung: 17.0 ± 5.9, CNRGGO/normal lung: 7.5 ± 5.0, and CNRconsolidation/normal lung: 15.3 ± 6.1.ConclusionWith the tested parameters, we achieved applied doses in the submillisievert range, on two different CT scanners without sacrificing diagnostic confidence regarding COVID-19 findings.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom