z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Pore space ownership issues for CO2 sequestration in the US
Author(s) -
Ian Duncan,
Scott Anderson,
JeanPhilippe Nicot
Publication year - 2009
Publication title -
energy procedia
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.474
H-Index - 81
ISSN - 1876-6102
DOI - 10.1016/j.egypro.2009.02.258
Subject(s) - characterisation of pore space in soil , space (punctuation) , real estate , estate , law and economics , business , law , surface (topology) , space law , mineral , natural resource economics , political science , geology , economics , outer space , chemistry , computer science , geometry , geotechnical engineering , mathematics , porosity , organic chemistry , operating system
Previous assertions that the ownership of subsurface pore space in states in the US under common law are divided into a majority following the American Rule (surface rights owner owns pore space) and a minority following the English Rule (mineral rights owner owns the pore space) are shown to be inconsistent with case law precedents traced back to 1861. The mineral estate is not likely to “own” the pore space or to have the right to use the pore space for purposes other than extracting minerals. The exception will be where the original fee simple owner sells the surface rights but reserves the subsurface mineral rights. In all other circumstances it is likely that courts will find that the surface owner also owns the pore space under common law

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom